How to Choose the Right Technology Provider
A practical framework for matching a technology provider to the problem, ownership model, and business outcome.
Evidence before recommendations
Concise resources for small and midsize organizations evaluating providers, assessments, networking, infrastructure, video security, Microsoft 365, responsible AI, and technology roadmaps.
Start here
A curated starting point for common technology decisions and emerging priorities.
A practical framework for matching a technology provider to the problem, ownership model, and business outcome.
Start with adoption, information structure, governance, security, and measurable work outcomes before adding tools.
Evaluate use cases, information sensitivity, human review, governance, and proof-of-value before broad AI adoption.
Explore the library
Search across every resource, or choose an industry and refine by topic.
38 resources found
Test permissions, ethical walls, indexing, versions, save-back, revocation, and audit evidence before connecting Protégé to Microsoft 365 or a legal DMS.
Assess access, retention, guest controls, audit evidence, deletion, legal hold, and encryption before placing client files in Protégé Vault or Workrooms.
Compare ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot, and Gemini by business fit, governance, cost, and adoption before choosing a platform and planning a controlled pilot.
Evaluate Lexis+ with Protégé across legal research, AI workflows, firm content, integrations, governance, and the costs your law firm must verify.
Separate AI drafting from controlling law, maintained legal guidance, firm precedents, matter records, and accountable attorney verification clearly.
Review educational applications through approved purpose, student data, vendor control, access, retention, family communication, security, and lifecycle ownership.
Evaluate Clio through intake, matters, documents, Microsoft 365, billing, AI, licensing, migration, and adoption before buying or upgrading the platform.
Build a law-firm AI operating boundary around confidentiality, verification, supervision, client communication, fees, approved tools, and accountable review.
Evaluate Claude for Legal through permissions, sources, retention, review controls, vendor terms, and pilot evidence before small law firm adoption.