Microsoft 365 Collaboration & Governance Assessment

Microsoft 365 Collaboration & Governance Assessment

Make Microsoft 365 a governed collaboration environment.

The Microsoft 365 Collaboration & Governance Assessment examines how Teams, SharePoint, OneDrive, permissions, external sharing, and lifecycle practices support—or obstruct—the way employees actually work.

Discuss an assessment

Typical warning signs

  • Teams, sites, and shared locations have grown without a clear structure
  • Employees are unsure where documents should be stored or shared
  • Permissions reflect history rather than current roles and responsibilities
  • External sharing and guest access are inconsistent or difficult to review
  • Microsoft 365 licensing and capabilities are underused or poorly understood

What we examine

The operating conditions behind the problem.

01

Collaboration patterns

How teams communicate, coordinate work, share documents, and collaborate with outside parties.

02

Teams architecture

Team and channel structure, ownership, naming, guest access, meetings, and workspace sprawl.

03

SharePoint structure

Sites, libraries, navigation, metadata, search, permissions, and alignment with business activities.

04

OneDrive boundaries

Appropriate personal-work use, organizational records, sharing practices, ownership, and transition risks.

05

Governance and lifecycle

Provisioning, ownership review, external sharing, retention, archival, deletion, and accountability.

06

Adoption and supportability

Role-based practices, training needs, administrative capacity, standards, and sustainable operating ownership.

Assessment outputs

A practical, decision-ready package.

The assessment turns current-state evidence into a shared design, clear ownership, and a prioritized path forward.

Current-state workspace map

A practical inventory of collaboration locations, ownership, usage patterns, and material risks.

Collaboration governance model

Defined decisions, roles, standards, review cadence, and escalation responsibilities.

Teams and SharePoint architecture

A future-state structure aligned with how departments, services, projects, and shared work operate.

Permissions priorities

Risk-based actions for ownership, guest access, external sharing, inherited access, and sensitive information.

Lifecycle and naming standards

Repeatable rules for requesting, naming, reviewing, archiving, and retiring collaboration spaces.

Prioritized roadmap

Sequenced remediation, governance, adoption, and implementation actions with accountable owners.

A practical next step

Would clearer Microsoft 365 structure and ownership make collaboration easier to sustain?

Start a fit conversation